
Will BNB reach $1000 by December 31, 2026?
5 of 5 top Polymarket traders hold No (100%) · No at 91¢ · $8K held · ends Jan 1, 2027
🔬
Research candidate
No
5
No 100%
$8.2K
$2.8K
60.8¢ → 91.1¢
+50% since entry · 5 traders
Research grade
Research candidateNo at 91%
Matches a rule that looked positive after costs in the short windows of our Oct 22 2026 backtest. The full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found no evidence for any of these rules: out of sample they lost money or were noise. A label for a pattern that once looked good, not an edge and not a recommendation.
- Quality net +3 or moreNot confirmed. Oct 22 backtest: net +3 when the consensus formed made +7.2 % a trade (n 358), with 5 events giving two thirds of it. Full year, out of sample, the closest rule (3+ proven winners, two thirds on the side) lost −1.9 % a trade (n 49,161, 95 % CI −2.6 to −1.1).
- Favourite (60–95¢)Full year, out of sample: 0.70–0.90 lost −0.9 % a trade (n 26,050, 95 % CI −1.5 to −0.3): the least bad band, still a loss. The Oct 22 backtest's +0.4 % (n 4,327) was not confirmed.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
5 of 5 top traders (100%)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
Signal Intelligence
Momentum
Flat
+0 pts consensus
Breadth
5 traders
Top 2 hold 87%
Freshness
Late
1351h old
Flip Quality
Clean
0 consensus flips
100% of non-arb traders are on No. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 87% of that side's value.
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() ThanksGivingTurkey1001 | Noavg 55.8¢ | $3.5K | $5.6K | +$2.2K | 68% 237-112 (349) |
DI Dimpled-Foal | Noavg 73¢ | $1.1K | $1.4K | +$320.93 | 53% 241-211 (452) |
![]() XieGuangKun | Noavg 59.4¢ | $387.59 | $637.62 | +$250.03 | 51% 367-349 (716) |
![]() Tenebrus7 | Noavg 77¢ | $279.41 | $335.46 | +$56.05 | 73% 2963-1076 (4039) |
EL Elias.Thornwell | Noavg 83.1¢ | $101.99 | $113.92 | +$11.93 | 77% 11784-3614 (15398) |
ThanksGivingTurkey1001Invested
$3,483.88
Value
$5.6K
PnL
+$2.2K
Record
68%
237-112 (349)
Invested
$1,118.33
Value
$1.4K
PnL
+$320.93
Record
53%
241-211 (452)
XieGuangKunInvested
$387.59
Value
$637.62
PnL
+$250.03
Record
51%
367-349 (716)
Tenebrus7Invested
$279.41
Value
$335.46
PnL
+$56.05
Record
73%
2963-1076 (4039)
Invested
$101.99
Value
$113.92
PnL
+$11.93
Record
77%
11784-3614 (15398)
Chat
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
91.1¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.5¢ fee (Crypto 7%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.