Consensus Lost ✗
Smart money consensus was No — but Yes won instead.
Al Hazem SC vs. Al Nassr Saudi Club: Neither team to score first?
Resolved Yes. 56% of the top Polymarket traders held No. The smart money was wrong.
💀
Lost
9
No 20%
$584.57
$143.2
Smart Money Signal
5 of 9 top traders (56%)5 hold an outcome priced under 50%6 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0X 0xd37d84a14d70ac7300defe9997074b3b3fd7c70 | Yesavg 7.3¢ | $21.98 | $300 | +$278.7 | 77% 142-43 (185) |
LU lukibazdonauki754 | Yesavg 30.6¢ | $61.25 | $200 | +$139.6 | 64% 1256-710 (1966) |
 dips.<$100 | Yesavg 95.3¢ | $69.67 | $73.14 | +$3.57 | 48% 17581-19269 (36850) |
 bot-rapin<$100 | Yesavg 97¢ | $11.09 | $11.43 | +$0.33 | 100% 20-0 (20) |
 VeryLucky888CTR | Noavg 93¢ | $279 | — | -$279 | 58% 53377-37936 (91313) |
XT xtxpleasecallmeCTR<$100 | Noavg 2.5¢ | — | — | +$0 | 32% 21778-45614 (67392) |
QW qwen300.fundCTR<$100 | Noavg 68.1¢ | — | — | +$0 | 47% 47428-53893 (101321) |
CI cigarettesCTR<$100 | Noavg 69.9¢ | — | — | +$0 | 50% 66106-66575 (132681) |
KO korda77CTR<$100 | Noavg 67¢ | — | — | +$0 | 32% 8602-18437 (27039) |
Invested
$21.98
Value
$300
PnL
+$278.7
Record
77%
142-43 (185)
Invested
$61.25
Value
$200
PnL
+$139.6
Record
64%
1256-710 (1966)
dips.<$100Invested
$69.67
Value
$73.14
PnL
+$3.57
Record
48%
17581-19269 (36850)
bot-rapin<$100Invested
$11.09
Value
$11.43
PnL
+$0.33
Record
100%
20-0 (20)
VeryLucky888CTRInvested
$279
Value
—
PnL
-$279
Record
58%
53377-37936 (91313)
Invested
—
Value
—
PnL
+$0
Record
32%
21778-45614 (67392)
Invested
—
Value
—
PnL
+$0
Record
47%
47428-53893 (101321)
Invested
—
Value
—
PnL
+$0
Record
50%
66106-66575 (132681)
Invested
—
Value
—
PnL
+$0
Record
32%
8602-18437 (27039)