Skip to content

Database problems: some data is degraded. We're fixing it right now.

Details
PolyConsensus
Back to Markets

Smart money holds the underdog side

Most tracked traders hold No, while the market favors Yes (88%). 4 of 11 traders hold an outcome priced under 50%.

Historically, consensus on sides priced under 40¢ lost money after costs.

Exact Score: Al Hazem SC 0 - 0 Al Nassr Saudi Club?

4 of 11 top Polymarket traders hold No (36%) · No at 12¢ · $25K held · ends Nov 6

Yes88¢No12¢Ends Fri, Nov 6, 2026View on Polymarket
SIGNAL

⚠️

Avoid

No

Consensus Traders

11

No 36%

Total Value

$24.8K

Combined PnL

$2.0K

Smart Money Entry

73.5¢ → 11.9¢

-84% since entry · 4 traders

Research grade

AvoidNo at 12%

Matches a pattern that lost clearly more than the plain consensus in our tests.

  • Consensus side under 30¢Full year, out of sample: 0.05–0.30 lost −8.1 % a trade (n 11,568), under 0.20 −20.5 % (n 3,615). Oct 22 backtest: −29.5 % (n 1,625). The strongest effect in every test.
  • Consensus under 60 %Every backtest started at 60 %+ of the holders; below that nothing was measured.

The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.

Smart Money Signal

No

4 of 11 top traders (36%)Underdog side (market favors Yes 88%)4 hold an outcome priced under 50%2 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)

Market Activity

Outcome Probabilities

Yes88%
No12%

Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome

Yes7 traders
Total Value$21.9K
Total Shares24,831
Combined PnL+$15.0K
No4 traders
Total Value$2.9K
Total Shares24,307
Combined PnL$-12.9K
Yes — 64%No — 36%

Signal Intelligence

Momentum

Flat

+0 pts consensus

Breadth

4 traders

Top 2 hold 100%

Freshness

Mature

21h old

Flip Quality

Clean

0 consensus flips

Breadth vs concentrationCrowded

36% of non-arb traders are on No. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 100% of that side's value.

Cohort consensusHand-picked vs top 1000 · whales, sharps, snipers, contrarians
The hand-picked list (3 on No) and the top 1000 (10 on Yes) disagree here.
whaleYes 50% · 2
Diverging
sharpYes 100% · 1
Diverging
ctrYes 71% · 7
Diverging
Hand-pickedNo 67% · 3
Aligned
Top 1000Yes 70% · 10
Diverging

Chat

EV Calculator

Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.

Break-even chance13.5%

11.9¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.6¢ fee (Sports 5%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.

Expected Value—
Expected ROIenter your estimate
Max Profit
+$639.99
Max Loss
-$100.00
Shares
740.0

A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.

Market Info

Condition ID
0xcf36f58f...1d8989
Slug
spl-haz-nsr-2026-11-06-exact-score-0-0
Trade on Polymarket