PolyConsensus

7. Smart money leaving

Should a position be sold when the holders behind it leave, and should money that fell before the signal block the entry?

nothing (some variants negative)Pre-registered on 2026-10-25best variant pooled +16.5 % a trade over 43 trades (chosen after the fact)

Definition

Exits on the baseline's entries: sell when the biggest holder at entry has cut 50 %+ of its shares, when the side's money fell 50 %+ from its peak since entry, or either. Entry filter at signal: the side's money fell 25 %+ over the previous 6 hours (markets younger than 6 h count as not fallen).

Baseline for every comparison: the plain consensus on the same markets (5+ tracked holders, 60 %+ on one side, price 0.05–0.95, first signal, held to resolution), 1 ¢ half-spread plus Polymarket's taker fee; $1 a trade.

Mean return per trade, with 95 % intervals

One marker per window: circle = A (curated wallets, Mar–Apr 2026, clean), square = B (all tracked wallets, Oct 2026, provisional, drift ranges dropped), diamond = pooled. Variants with fewer than 30 trades in a window are left out of the chart; the table below has every number.

Every variant

Smart money leaving: every pre-registered variant per window
VariantExpectedWindow AWindow BPooled A + BIS / OOS (pooled)vs its baseline (pooled)GuardVerdict
7a exit when the biggest holder at entry cut >= 50 %
strategy, compared with base-hold
unknown−4.7 % [−8.1, −1.4]
n = 3,064, hit 59 %, price 0.62
−5.1 % [−7.3, −2.8]
n = 3,736, hit 63 %, price 0.64
−4.9 % [−6.9, −3.0]
n = 6,800, hit 61 %, price 0.63
IS −3.8 % (3,564)
OOS −5.5 % (2,743)
−0.5 [−1.3, +0.1]
points vs base-hold, p = 0.9196
nonegative
7b exit when the side's money fell >= 50 % from its peak
strategy, compared with base-hold
unknown−4.7 % [−7.8, −1.4]
n = 3,075, hit 58 %, price 0.62
−5.5 % [−7.7, −3.3]
n = 3,738, hit 61 %, price 0.64
−5.1 % [−7.0, −3.2]
n = 6,813, hit 60 %, price 0.63
IS −3.4 % (3,565)
OOS −6.6 % (2,745)
−0.6 [−1.6, +0.3]
points vs base-hold, p = 0.8936
nonegative
7c exit on either
strategy, compared with base-hold
unknown−5.3 % [−8.2, −2.3]
n = 3,076, hit 57 %, price 0.62
−5.6 % [−7.7, −3.3]
n = 3,727, hit 60 %, price 0.64
−5.4 % [−7.2, −3.6]
n = 6,803, hit 58 %, price 0.63
IS −4.1 % (3,554)
OOS −6.4 % (2,746)
−0.9 [−1.9, +0.2]
points vs base-hold, p = 0.9545
nonegative
7d entry filter: the side's money did NOT fall >= 25 % in the last 6 h
entry filter, decided at the signal
better−3.9 % [−7.3, −0.2]
n = 3,043, hit 64 %, price 0.62
−4.9 % [−7.3, −2.4]
n = 3,733, hit 65 %, price 0.64
−4.5 % [−6.6, −2.4]
n = 6,776, hit 64 %, price 0.63
IS −2.8 % (3,564)
OOS −6.1 % (2,720)
−20.9 [−70.4, +20.1]
points vs the dropped trades, p = 0.8127
nonegative
7d-fell the side's money fell >= 25 % in the last 6 h (the dropped set)
entry filter, decided at the signal
worsen = 20 (under 30)n = 23 (under 30)+16.5 % [−25.0, +62.1]
n = 43, hit 60 %, price 0.57
IS +20.4 % (18)
OOS +24.0 % (22)
+20.9 [−20.5, +73.8]
points vs the dropped trades, p = 0.1863
nonothing

What this data can and cannot show

Can: Whether these exits lose less than the lost / flip exits of the core study did, and whether a draining side is a worse entry.

Cannot: Sales outside the tracked set, and (May-October 2026) merges, which the activity export lacks: some exits are invisible and the holder stays in place.

Caveats that apply to every signal

  • Only tracked wallets' fills exist, from when the site started tracking them; the replay is closer to the chain than to what the site displayed (no Polymarket position overrides, merges missing May–Oct 2026).
  • Window B's fill times run early in parts of October 2026; the affected ranges are dropped and the rest is not proven clean. Its numbers are provisional until the repaired export is in.
  • Prices are the last tracked fill, not the order book (median error 0.5 ¢, p90 up to 16 ¢ on fast markets); entries happen on the hour (5-minute steps in play).
  • The windows are 7 and 3 weeks long; effects of a few points cannot pass a guard over 40 variants there. A failed guard is not evidence of no effect — it is the absence of evidence.
  • Nothing here is trading advice. Past replays, even clean ones, do not pay future trades.