Smart money holds the underdog side
Most tracked traders hold Yes, while the market favors No (100%). 6 of 6 traders hold an outcome priced under 50%.
Historically, consensus on sides priced under 40¢ lost money after costs.

Will Ricardo Pablo Belmont Cassinelli win the next Lima mayoral elections?
6 of 6 top Polymarket traders hold Yes (100%) · Yes at 0.1¢ · $26 held · ended Oct 5
⚠️
Avoid
Yes
6
Yes 100%
$25.7
-$325.37
2¢ → 0.1¢
-92% since entry · 5 traders
Research grade
AvoidYes at 0%
Matches a pattern that lost clearly more than the plain consensus in our tests.
- Consensus side under 30¢Full year, out of sample: 0.05–0.30 lost −8.1 % a trade (n 11,568), under 0.20 −20.5 % (n 3,615). Oct 22 backtest: −29.5 % (n 1,625). The strongest effect in every test.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
6 of 6 top traders (100%)Underdog side (market favors No 100%)6 hold an outcome priced under 50%5 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
Signal Intelligence
Momentum
Flat
+0 pts consensus
Breadth
6 traders
Top 2 hold 82%
Freshness
Late
743h old
Flip Quality
Choppy
19 consensus flips
100% of non-arb traders are on Yes. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 82% of that side's value.
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AN anoin123CTR | Yesavg 2¢ | $238.68 | $17.54 | -$221.14 | 47% 479-535 (1014) |
DO donthackmeCTR<$100 | Yesavg 2¢ | $47.56 | $3.5 | -$44.07 | 89% 9267-1189 (10456) |
0X 0x9b129aD05Bc0a8df3C73DfCC66fE75252DaEC2D5-1778811687225CTR<$100 | Yesavg 2¢ | $34.62 | $2.18 | -$36.89 | 45% 1527-1832 (3359) |
0X 0xc7D02944A76B9F83B199e9090ECC92C82d241F8a-1776944395495CTR<$100 | Yesavg 1.4¢ | $18.34 | $1.96 | -$16.38 | 58% 16712-12344 (29056) |
![]() LucerysCTR<$100 | Yesavg 1.9¢ | $5.52 | $0.42 | -$5.1 | 92% 8456-738 (9194) |
0X 0xfBd8C9C22cA76B3662d0e53A4f79719FDC684027-1779347618060CTR<$100 | Yes | $51 | $0.1 | -$1.81 | 56% 5852-4578 (10430) |
Invested
$238.68
Value
$17.54
PnL
-$221.14
Record
47%
479-535 (1014)
Invested
$47.56
Value
$3.5
PnL
-$44.07
Record
89%
9267-1189 (10456)
Invested
$34.62
Value
$2.18
PnL
-$36.89
Record
45%
1527-1832 (3359)
Invested
$18.34
Value
$1.96
PnL
-$16.38
Record
58%
16712-12344 (29056)
LucerysCTR<$100Invested
$5.52
Value
$0.42
PnL
-$5.1
Record
92%
8456-738 (9194)
Invested
$51
Value
$0.1
PnL
-$1.81
Record
56%
5852-4578 (10430)
Chat
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
0.1¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.1¢ fee (Other / General 5%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.
Market Info
Traders in this Market
anoin123
CTRYes — $17.54
donthackme
CTRYes — $3.5
0x9b129aD05Bc0a8df3C73DfCC66fE75252DaEC2D5-1778811687225
CTRYes — $2.18
0xc7D02944A76B9F83B199e9090ECC92C82d241F8a-1776944395495
CTRYes — $1.96

Lucerys
CTRYes — $0.42
0xfBd8C9C22cA76B3662d0e53A4f79719FDC684027-1779347618060
CTRYes — $0.1