
Will Bitcoin reach $74,000 on November 12?
4 of 6 top Polymarket traders hold No (67%) · No at 90¢ · $20K held · ends Nov 13
🔬
Research candidate
No
6
No 67%
1 arb excluded
$19.8K
$-8.3K
69.5¢ → 89.5¢
+29% since entry · 4 traders
Research grade
Research candidateNo at 90%
Matches a rule that looked positive after costs in the short windows of our Oct 22 2026 backtest. The full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found no evidence for any of these rules: out of sample they lost money or were noise. A label for a pattern that once looked good, not an edge and not a recommendation.
- Quality net +3 or moreNot confirmed. Oct 22 backtest: net +3 when the consensus formed made +7.2 % a trade (n 358), with 5 events giving two thirds of it. Full year, out of sample, the closest rule (3+ proven winners, two thirds on the side) lost −1.9 % a trade (n 49,161, 95 % CI −2.6 to −1.1).
- Favourite (60–95¢)Full year, out of sample: 0.70–0.90 lost −0.9 % a trade (n 26,050, 95 % CI −1.5 to −0.3): the least bad band, still a loss. The Oct 22 backtest's +0.4 % (n 4,327) was not confirmed.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
4 of 6 top traders (67%)1 arbitrage trader dimmed2 hold an outcome priced under 50%
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0X 0x06dc51826bc524d9a83770e7de9dd7e005b0452 | Noavg 69¢ | $20.7K | $15.4K | $-5.3K | 67% 105-51 (156) |
0X 0xDB5 | Noavg 59.5¢ | $1.1K | $1.7K | +$601.73 | 74% 75-26 (101) |
CL CleanCoinFlip | Noavg 81.7¢ | $1.4K | $1.6K | +$153.07 | 47% 27-31 (58) |
![]() justdance | Noavg 80¢ | $976.07 | $409.8 | -$70.62 | 63% 24-14 (38) |
EA Eager47259CTR | Yesavg 66.1¢ | $4.4K | $375.47 | $-3.6K | 47% 102-115 (217) |
NO NotJumpARB<$100 | Noavg 77.1¢ | $1.5K | $213.92 | +$15.57 | 54% 428-364 (792) |
| └ No leg | Noavg 77.1¢ | $132.06 | $153.28 | +$173.75 | |
| └ Yes leg | Yesavg 13¢ | $74.91 | $60.64 | -$158.18 | |
TO TokorCTR | Yesavg 58.6¢ | $213.68 | $109.47 | -$104.22 | 51% 92-89 (181) |
Invested
$20,708
Value
$15.4K
PnL
$-5.3K
Record
67%
105-51 (156)
Invested
$1,117.27
Value
$1.7K
PnL
+$601.73
Record
74%
75-26 (101)
Invested
$1,423.02
Value
$1.6K
PnL
+$153.07
Record
47%
27-31 (58)
justdanceInvested
$976.07
Value
$409.8
PnL
-$70.62
Record
63%
24-14 (38)
Invested
$4,447.02
Value
$375.47
PnL
$-3.6K
Record
47%
102-115 (217)
Invested
$1,456.88
Value
$213.92
PnL
+$15.57
Record
54%
428-364 (792)
Both legs:
Invested
$213.68
Value
$109.47
PnL
-$104.22
Record
51%
92-89 (181)
Chat
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
89.5¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.6¢ fee (Crypto 7%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.