Smart money holds the underdog side
Most tracked traders hold Yes, while the market favors No (63%). 5 of 8 traders hold an outcome priced under 50%.
Historically, consensus on sides priced under 40¢ lost money after costs.

Exact Score: FK Kolos Kovalivka 2 - 0 FK Polissia?
5 of 8 top Polymarket traders hold Yes (63%) · Yes at 38¢ · $461 held · ended Nov 1
⚖️
Neutral
Yes
8
Yes 63%
$460.92
-$9.29
33.8¢ → 37.5¢
+11% since entry · 5 traders
Research grade
NeutralYes at 38%
No measured edge, which here means a loss: the plain consensus (5+ holders, 60 %+, held to resolution) lost −3.0 % a trade after costs out of sample in the full-year test (n 86,296, 95 % CI −3.6 to −2.4 %).
- Side priced 30–50¢Full year, out of sample: 0.30–0.50 lost −4.8 % a trade (n 16,830, 95 % CI −6.6 to −3.1), worse than the plain consensus.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
5 of 8 top traders (63%)Underdog side (market favors No 63%)5 hold an outcome priced under 50%5 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
Signal Intelligence
Momentum
Flat
+0 pts consensus
Breadth
5 traders
Top 2 hold 73%
Freshness
Late
124h old
Flip Quality
Clean
0 consensus flips
63% of non-arb traders are on Yes. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 73% of that side's value.
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0X 0x62D56a93516DB0181F7cDEa919191EC07Fa43D4F-1793322863179CTR | Yesavg 2.7¢ | $9.3 | $129.1 | +$119.8 | — |
![]() VeryLucky888 | Noavg 97.7¢ | $200 | $125 | -$70.3 | 49% 60-63 (123) |
IW iWasEnoughCTR | Yesavg 99.9¢ | $249.75 | $93.75 | -$156 | — |
UP UpTheBluesCTR<$100 | Yesavg 2.3¢ | $4.7 | $75 | +$70.3 | 0% 0-36 (36) |
AS asdkjhsad<$100 | Noavg 0.1¢ | $0.04 | $25 | +$24.96 | — |
BL BlackMamba08<$100 | Noavg 10¢ | $1.11 | $6.94 | +$5.83 | — |
PA pauleta23CTR<$100 | Yesavg 90¢ | $10 | $4.17 | -$5.83 | 21% 60-222 (282) |
![]() SilentSharkCTR<$100 | Yesavg 0.1¢ | $0.01 | $1.96 | +$1.95 | — |
Invested
$9.3
Value
$129.1
PnL
+$119.8
Record
—
VeryLucky888Invested
$200
Value
$125
PnL
-$70.3
Record
49%
60-63 (123)
Invested
$249.75
Value
$93.75
PnL
-$156
Record
—
Invested
$4.7
Value
$75
PnL
+$70.3
Record
0%
0-36 (36)
Invested
$0.04
Value
$25
PnL
+$24.96
Record
—
Invested
$1.11
Value
$6.94
PnL
+$5.83
Record
—
Invested
$10
Value
$4.17
PnL
-$5.83
Record
21%
60-222 (282)
SilentSharkCTR<$100Invested
$0.01
Value
$1.96
PnL
+$1.95
Record
—
Chat
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
37.5¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 1.2¢ fee (Sports 5%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.