Skip to content

Database problems: some data is degraded. We're fixing it right now.

Details
PolyConsensus
Back to Markets

Smart money holds the underdog side

Most tracked traders hold Red Wings, while the market favors Lightning (70%). 4 of 9 traders hold an outcome priced under 50%.

Historically, consensus on sides priced under 40¢ lost money after costs.

Red Wings vs. Lightning

4 of 9 top Polymarket traders hold Red Wings (44%) · Red Wings at 31¢ · $2K held · ends Nov 4

Red Wings31¢Lightning69¢Ends Wed, Nov 4, 2026View on Polymarket
SIGNAL

⚖️

Neutral

Red Wings

Consensus Traders

9

Red Wings 44%

1 arb excluded

Total Value

$2.3K

Combined PnL

$69.52

Smart Money Entry

29.2¢ → 30.5¢

+5% since entry · 4 traders

Research grade

NeutralRed Wings at 31%

No measured edge, which here means a loss: the plain consensus (5+ holders, 60 %+, held to resolution) lost −3.0 % a trade after costs out of sample in the full-year test (n 86,296, 95 % CI −3.6 to −2.4 %).

  • Consensus under 60 %Every backtest started at 60 %+ of the holders; below that nothing was measured.
  • Side priced 30–50¢Full year, out of sample: 0.30–0.50 lost −4.8 % a trade (n 16,830, 95 % CI −6.6 to −3.1), worse than the plain consensus.

The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.

Smart Money Signal

Red Wings

4 of 9 top traders (44%)Underdog side (market favors Lightning 70%)1 arbitrage trader dimmed4 hold an outcome priced under 50%6 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)

Market Activity

Outcome Probabilities

Red Wings31%
Lightning70%

Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome

Red Wings4 traders
Total Value$1.6K
Total Shares5,367
Combined PnL+$69.32
Lightning5 traders
Total Value$148.67
Total Shares211
Combined PnL+$0.21
Red Wings — 44%Lightning — 56%

Signal Intelligence

Momentum

Surging

+4 pts consensus

Breadth

4 traders

Top 2 hold 84%

Freshness

Fresh

2h old

Flip Quality

Clean

0 consensus flips

Breadth vs concentrationCrowded

44% of non-arb traders are on Red Wings. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 84% of that side's value.

Cohort consensusHand-picked vs top 1000 · whales, sharps, snipers, contrarians
The hand-picked list (1 on Red Wings) and the top 1000 (9 on Lightning) disagree here.
whaleRed Wings 50% · 2
Aligned
sharpLightning 100% · 1
Diverging
ctrRed Wings 80% · 5
Aligned
Hand-pickedRed Wings 100% · 1
Aligned
Top 1000Lightning 56% · 9
Diverging

Chat

EV Calculator

Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.

Break-even chance32.6%

30.5¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 1.1¢ fee (Sports 5%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.

Expected Value—
Expected ROIenter your estimate
Max Profit
+$206.95
Max Loss
-$100.00
Shares
306.9

A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.

Market Info

Condition ID
0xf63c3d6e...7ae0c7
Slug
nhl-det-tb-2026-11-03
Trade on Polymarket