Smart money holds the underdog side
Most tracked traders hold Over, while the market favors Under (77%). 2 of 6 traders hold an outcome priced under 50%.
Historically, consensus on sides priced under 40¢ lost money after costs.

Inter Miami CF vs. FC Cincinnati: O/U 2.5
2 of 6 top Polymarket traders hold Over (33%) · Over at 23¢ · $3K held · ended Oct 28
⚠️
Avoid
Over
6
Over 33%
3 arb excluded
$3.0K
$24.29
47.1¢ → 23¢
-51% since entry · 2 traders
Research grade
AvoidOver at 23%
Matches a pattern that lost clearly more than the plain consensus in our tests.
- Consensus side under 30¢Full year, out of sample: 0.05–0.30 lost −8.1 % a trade (n 11,568), under 0.20 −20.5 % (n 3,615). Oct 22 backtest: −29.5 % (n 1,625). The strongest effect in every test.
- Spread or totalOct 22 backtest: spreads and totals −14.5 % a trade in spring (95 % CI −27 to −1), +1.5 % in October: no edge.
- Consensus under 60 %Every backtest started at 60 %+ of the holders; below that nothing was measured.
The rules come from our Oct 22 2026 backtest (one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees). Our full-year test without hindsight (Oct 26 2026) found none of them profitable out of sample, and the plain consensus lost −3.0 % a trade. The grade describes the market; it is not a forecast, not an edge and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
2 of 6 top traders (33%)Underdog side (market favors Under 77%)3 arbitrage traders dimmed2 hold an outcome priced under 50%4 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
Signal Intelligence
Momentum
Flat
+0 pts consensus
Breadth
1 traders
Top 2 hold 100%
Freshness
Fresh
0h old
Flip Quality
Clean
0 consensus flips
25% of non-arb traders are on Over. Concentration is driven by the top two positions owning 100% of that side's value.
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GO GoalLineGhostARB<$100 | Overavg 60.3¢ | $3.4K | $2.3K | $-1.1K | 50% 24471-24125 (48596) |
| └ Under leg | Underavg 65.6¢ | $1.3K | $1.5K | +$228.25 | |
| └ Over leg | Overavg 60.3¢ | $2.1K | $803.98 | $-1.3K | |
CA CannaeARB<$100 | Overavg 79¢ | $200.2 | $242.93 | +$42.73 | 53% 15769-13947 (29716) |
| └ Under leg | Underavg 19.8¢ | $98.4 | $154.01 | +$55.62 | |
| └ Over leg | Overavg 79¢ | $101.8 | $88.91 | -$12.89 | |
AN Anon455CTR | Overavg 47.4¢ | $213.81 | $146.46 | -$67.35 | 56% 2651-2105 (4756) |
![]() tradecraft | Underavg 35¢ | $56 | $107.99 | +$52 | 52% 5899-5543 (11442) |
![]() HRTrading<$100 | Underavg 38.9¢ | $51.64 | $89.68 | +$38.04 | 53% 3243-2909 (6152) |
FO fooooolARB<$100 | Overavg 51.1¢ | $74.64 | $79.51 | +$4.86 | 50% 10588-10447 (21035) |
| └ Over leg | Overavg 51.1¢ | $49.85 | $39.97 | -$9.88 | |
| └ Under leg | Underavg 37¢ | $24.79 | $39.53 | +$14.74 | |
![]() poshposh<$100 | Underavg 48¢ | $5.58 | $7.21 | +$1.63 | 59% 9478-6467 (15945) |
RO Rocko33CTR<$100 | Overavg 34¢ | $3.8 | $3.8 | +$0 | 64% 1014-578 (1592) |
LE LeLynxMalynx<$100 | Underavg 20¢ | $1 | $1.55 | -$0.03 | 58% 28159-20759 (48918) |
Invested
$3,415.92
Value
$2.3K
PnL
$-1.1K
Record
50%
24471-24125 (48596)
Both legs:
Invested
$200.2
Value
$242.93
PnL
+$42.73
Record
53%
15769-13947 (29716)
Both legs:
Invested
$213.81
Value
$146.46
PnL
-$67.35
Record
56%
2651-2105 (4756)
tradecraftInvested
$56
Value
$107.99
PnL
+$52
Record
52%
5899-5543 (11442)
HRTrading<$100Invested
$51.64
Value
$89.68
PnL
+$38.04
Record
53%
3243-2909 (6152)
Invested
$74.64
Value
$79.51
PnL
+$4.86
Record
50%
10588-10447 (21035)
Both legs:
poshposh<$100Invested
$5.58
Value
$7.21
PnL
+$1.63
Record
59%
9478-6467 (15945)
Invested
$3.8
Value
$3.8
PnL
+$0
Record
64%
1014-578 (1592)
Invested
$1
Value
$1.55
PnL
-$0.03
Record
58%
28159-20759 (48918)
Chat
Sign in with your wallet to post.
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
23.0¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.9¢ fee (Sports 5%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.