
Athletic Club leading at halftime?
2 of 3 top Polymarket traders hold Yes (67%) · Yes at 100¢ · $559 held · ended Oct 25
⚖️
Neutral
Yes
3
Yes 67%
$559.27
$36.75
89¢ → 99.9¢
+12% since entry · 2 traders
Research grade
NeutralYes at 100%
No measured edge either way. The plain consensus (5+ holders, 60 %+, held to resolution) lost −4.8 % a trade after costs (n 10,051, 95 % CI −6.5 to −3.1 %).
- Side priced over 95¢0.90–0.99 was −0.2 % a trade (n 4,210); above 95¢ little is left to win and the backtests' bands stop at 0.95.
- Fewer than 5 holdersEvery backtest needed 5+ holders; with fewer nothing was measured.
Backtest of Oct 22 2026: one entry per market, held to resolution, after a 1¢ half-spread and Polymarket's taker fees. The grade never goes above “Research candidate”: no rule passed the multiple-testing check. It is not a forecast and not advice.
Smart Money Signal
2 of 3 top traders (67%)1 holds an outcome priced under 50%2 small positions dimmed (<$100 invested)
Outcome Probabilities
Smart Money Breakdown by Outcome
| Trader | Position | Invested | Value | PnL | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() RN1 | Yesavg 89¢ | $493.95 | $554.45 | +$60.5 | 55% 43540-35826 (79366) |
![]() HRTrading<$100 | Yesavg 84¢ | $3.78 | $4.5 | +$0.72 | 58% 1472-1088 (2560) |
MI MinevaJCTR<$100 | Noavg 7.4¢ | $24.79 | $0.33 | -$24.46 | 57% 881-656 (1537) |
Chat
Sign in with your wallet to post.
EV Calculator
Consensus % is how many tracked traders hold a side, not a win probability.
99.9¢ price + 1.0¢ spread + 0.0¢ fee (Sports 5%). Win more often than this and the bet pays.
A market order pays the taker fee and crosses the spread (assumed 1.0¢); a limit order pays no fee but may not fill. The fee category is a guess from the title.

